Search Blog:
 



Category List

2009 Legislative Session

2010 Legislative Session

2011 Legislative Session

2012 Legislative Session

2013 Legislative Day

2013 Legislative Session

Accountability

Achievement Gap

Affordable Care Act

Alliance for a Healthier Generation

ASBSD

Award

Bill Tracker

Board Meetings

BoardDocs

Bulletin

Bullying

Capital Outlay

Charter Schools

Collective Bargaining

Common Core

Communication

Communications

Consolidation

Continuing Contract

CPI-W

CTE

Data Reporting

Early Learning

Economic Impact

education funding

Education Funding

Enrollment

ESA

ESAs

ESL

Federal Education Policy

Federal Stimulus

Fund Balance

Graduation Rates

Grants

High School

House Education Committee

IDEA

Joint Convention

Kindergarten

LAN

LEP

Moving South Dakota Forward

National Standards

NCLB

Negotiations

News Links

NSBA

Open Government

opt-out

Policy

Pre-K

Pre-Kindergarten

Preschool

Protective Trust

SASD

School Board Election

School Board Policy

School Choice

School Facilities

School funding

School Funding

School Nutrition

School Safety

SDRS

Senate Education Committee

Sequestration

Small Schools

Smalls Schools

Social Media

SPED

Spring Tour

State Aid

state funding

State Funding

State of the State

Student Achievement

Summer Study

Supreme Court

Taxation

Teacher Quality

Teacher Salaries

Teachers

Transportation

Veto

Webinar

Webinars



Advocacy Tools

ASBSD Bill Tracker

Legislative Action Network



By Month

May, 2013

April, 2013

March, 2013

February, 2013

January, 2013

December, 2012

March, 2012

February, 2012

January, 2012

November, 2011

April, 2011

March, 2011

February, 2011

January, 2011

March, 2010

February, 2010

January, 2010

December, 2009

August, 2009

April, 2009

March, 2009

February, 2009

January, 2009

October, 2008

May, 2008

April, 2008

March, 2008

February, 2008

January, 2008

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

View Full Archive



Blogroll

ASBJ Leading Source

Education Commission of the States

EduWonk

NSBA Board Buzz

Politics K-12



RSS Feed



Home > Open Forum Blog
Category: School Board Policy

ASBSD backing bill to maintain driver education, pre-k programs
Posted Wednesday, January 18, 2012

ASBSD is working with lawmakers to give local school boards the flexibility to charge tuition for voluntary driver education and per-kindergarten programs. ASBSD Executive Director Dr. Wade Pogany said Wednesday that the proposal is nearly ready to be filed.

Prior to a recent Attorney General opinion, school boards have worked with parents to provide academic programs that aren’t required by law, but still a benefit to children and young adults. In many cases, parents voluntarily pay tuition to offset program costs. Without a legislative fix, school boards would be forced to fully fund the programs, or not provide them at all.

“Schools need the flexibility to work with their communities,” Pogany said. “When parents ask for a service and provide a means to pay for that service, school boards should be able to have those discussions.”



Categories:2012 Legislative Session, Pre-K, School Board Policy,

Comments (0) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story



Bullying bill defeated again
Posted Thursday, January 27, 2011

Lawmakers on Thursday morning turned away a measure requiring all school districts to adopt bullying policies.

Members of Senate Education deferred SB 104 to the 41st Legislative Day on a 4-3 vote, effectively killing the legislation for a third year in a row. Legislators who voted against the bill said local schools should be given the full authority to address bullying.

“We’re not hard-hearted,” said Sen. Elizabeth Kraus, R-Rapid City, before voting to kill the measure. “We just truly believe it’s a local control issue.”

Sen. Stan Adelstein, R- Rapid City, told the panel that South Dakota has the highest percentage in the nation of students who commit suicide – something he said the bullying legislation would work to counter. He urged lawmakers to endorse the measure, saying it was a “matter of helping children to stay alive.”

ASBSD supported the bill based on a resolution adopted in November by the ASBSD Delegate Assembly. Representatives from local school boards told ASBSD staff to support legislation that requires local school boards to adopt written bullying prevention policies, provided the legislation gives local school boards flexibility

“Everything in the bill as written adheres to the position our school board members have taken,” said ASBSD Director of Legal Services Bill Engberg.

Representatives from other education organizations lined up against the bill, including lobbyists for school administrators, small schools, mid-sized schools, large schools and Rapid City and Sioux Falls. All opposed the measure on the grounds that it went too far into local decision-making.




Categories:2011 Legislative Session, School Board Policy, Bullying,

Comments (1) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story



Bullying bill fails on House floor. Will it come back again?
Posted Tuesday, February 24, 2009

A third attempt to revive a bill that would require all schools to adopt bullying policies has stalled on the House floor.

Lawmakers decided Tuesday not to allow further debate on HB 1279, ending a procedural maneuver called a “smoke-out” that allows lawmakers to circumvent the committee process to pass legislation.

In this case, lawmakers voted 36-34 to uphold the House Education Committee's recommendation that the bill “Do Not Pass.” By sticking with the committee recommendation, the issue was not granted a debate on the House floor.

Following the failure of the smoke-out, ASBSD lobbyists learned that the bill's sponsor, Rep. Dan Lederman, R-Dakota Dunes, may try to revive the issue in the Senate Education Committee.



Categories:2009 Legislative Session, School Board Policy,

Comments (0) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story



UPDATE: Bullying bill stopped in committee, revived in the House.
Posted Friday, February 20, 2009

UPDATE (2:15 p.m.) - Proponents of the Bullying bill have used the legislative "smoke-out" provision to revive HB 1279. The procedure assures a House vote on the issue. ASBSD Lobbyists say that the committee will recommend the bill "Do Not Pass."
 
Lawmakers killed legislation to require all school districts to adopt policies prohibiting bullying and harassment, instead offering a stern warning that failure to address the issue at the local level will lead to legislation next year.

Members of House Education rejected HB 1279 on an 8-7 vote, capping a lengthy discussion on the status and importance of school district bullying policies.

“I don't think that the bill is quite ready to be put on the books yet,” said House Education Chair Ed McLaughlin, R-Rapid City, who cast the deciding vote. “We'll leave it to local school districts to address it.”

Nearly every committee member stressed the need to protect students through bullying policies, but less than half voted for it – a dynamic that concerned Rep. Ryan Olson, R-Onida.

“I think this committee agrees that this policy should be adopted,” Rep. Olson said, saying that if the committee voted down the bill, they'd each to have to consider what they would accept as evidence that schools have responded appropriately.

Rep. Bill Van Gerpen, R-Tyndall, voted against the legislation, but said the bill succeeded in creating awareness. It should be clear to school districts that lawmakers are interested in the issue, he said.

ASBSD opposed the legislation, walking a nuanced line against complicated state mandates while encouraging schools to develop local policy. The association has several policies relating to harassment and bullying, and ASBSD will draft a comprehensive sample policy and regulations to disseminate to schools.

The association also plans to work alongside the Department of Education and education advocacy groups to ensure school districts have resources at the local level to address the situation.



Categories:2009 Legislative Session, School Board Policy,

Comments (0) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story



Bullying bill resurfaces
Posted Wednesday, February 18, 2009

A bill requiring all school districts to develop policies prohibiting bullying and harassment was brought back to life Wednesday.

Members of House Education brought HB 1279 off the table after the bill's sponsor, Rep. Dan Lederman, R-Dakota Dunes, said he drafted amendments to resolve opponent objections to the legislation.

The committee quickly accepted Rep. Lederman's changes, and then amended the bill a third time to refine the definition of harassment to mirror language from a Brandon Valley School District policy that prohibits bullying.

The rapid pace of action and lack of public testimony on the new measure concerned some lawmakers.

“I feel like we're running through this very rapidly, making changes on the fly that could have some unintended consequences,” said Rep. Kim Vanneman, R-Ideal. “We need to step back here and really evaluate this.”

The committee voted 8-7 to delay action until Friday, when public testimony will be taken.
 
Open Forum Note: Open Forum will be digging today to see if we can find another instance of the Legislature writing school district policy into state law. We'll let you know what we turn up.


Categories:2009 Legislative Session, School Board Policy,

Comments (0) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story



Legislation aims to mandate bullying policies
Posted Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Lawmakers will consider whether to require school districts to adopt policies prohibiting harassment and bullying.

Rep. Dan Lederman, R-Dakota Dunes, is the prime sponsor for HB 1279, a measure that defines bullying and harassment and requires school districts to adopt anti-bullying policies by Dec. 1, 2009.

Under the bill, bullying is defined by “causing of physical hurt or psychological distress on one or more students or employees.” Harassment is defined as use of “data or computer software, written or verbal communication, or conduct” that places a student or school employee “in reasonable fear of harm” and “substantially interferes with a student's educational performance” or “substantially disrupts the orderly operation of a school.”

According to the legislation, local policies would have to:

  • Define and prohibit bullying;
  • Outline consequences for bullying;
  • Develop mechanism for reporting bullying; and
  • Develop a procedure to investigate and respond to any report of bullying.

The legislation allows local school districts the option to incorporate several other elements in to bullying and harassment policies, including a system to notify parents of any bullying incident and to determine whether any act of bullying is within the jurisdiction of the school district.

ASBSD opposes the legislation, but not the concept. The state school board association encourages school boards to adopt bullying policies, but recognizes that the scope and form of policy varies by school district and should be left to each community.

Most schools already have bullying policies. But, even if a school board has adopted a formal policy prohibiting harassment and bullying, the legislation stipulates that the board must review the policy to ensure compliance.



Categories:2009 Legislative Session, School Board Policy,

Comments (0) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story


Site by factor360 design + technology