Search Blog:
 



Category List

2009 Legislative Session

2010 Legislative Session

2011 Legislative Session

2012 Legislative Session

2013 Legislative Day

2013 Legislative Session

Accountability

Achievement Gap

Affordable Care Act

Alliance for a Healthier Generation

ASBSD

Award

Bill Tracker

Board Meetings

BoardDocs

Bulletin

Bullying

Capital Outlay

Charter Schools

Collective Bargaining

Common Core

Communication

Communications

Consolidation

Continuing Contract

CPI-W

CTE

Data Reporting

Early Learning

Economic Impact

education funding

Education Funding

Enrollment

ESA

ESAs

ESL

Federal Education Policy

Federal Stimulus

Fund Balance

Graduation Rates

Grants

High School

House Education Committee

IDEA

Joint Convention

Kindergarten

LAN

LEP

Moving South Dakota Forward

National Standards

NCLB

Negotiations

News Links

NSBA

Open Government

opt-out

Policy

Pre-K

Pre-Kindergarten

Preschool

Protective Trust

SASD

School Board Election

School Board Policy

School Choice

School Facilities

School funding

School Funding

School Nutrition

School Safety

SDRS

Senate Education Committee

Sequestration

Small Schools

Smalls Schools

Social Media

SPED

Spring Tour

State Aid

state funding

State Funding

State of the State

Student Achievement

Summer Study

Supreme Court

Taxation

Teacher Quality

Teacher Salaries

Teachers

Transportation

Veto

Webinar

Webinars



Advocacy Tools

ASBSD Bill Tracker

Legislative Action Network



By Month

May, 2013

April, 2013

March, 2013

February, 2013

January, 2013

December, 2012

March, 2012

February, 2012

January, 2012

November, 2011

April, 2011

March, 2011

February, 2011

January, 2011

March, 2010

February, 2010

January, 2010

December, 2009

August, 2009

April, 2009

March, 2009

February, 2009

January, 2009

October, 2008

May, 2008

April, 2008

March, 2008

February, 2008

January, 2008

December, 2007

November, 2007

October, 2007

September, 2007

August, 2007

June, 2007

May, 2007

April, 2007

March, 2007

February, 2007

January, 2007

View Full Archive



Blogroll

ASBJ Leading Source

Education Commission of the States

EduWonk

NSBA Board Buzz

Politics K-12



RSS Feed



Home > Open Forum Blog
Category: SDRS

Lawmakers endorse changes to state retirement system
Posted Friday, January 20, 2012

A Senate panel on Thursday unanimously endorsed slight modifications and improvements to the South Dakota Retirement system, sending the proposed package of laws to the full Senate for consideration. Senate Retirement Laws approved three pieces of legislation – SB 29, SB 30 and SB 31 - all of which were recommended by the administrators of the public pension plan.

Senate Bill 29 allows the state retirement system to offer a Roth deferred compensation plan within the supplemental retirement system. The option, made possible by the federal Small Business Jobs Act, gives public employees a chance to make additional contributions to their retirement with after-tax dollars.

Most retirement system income is taxed at the time of distribution. Individuals aren't taxed on benefits received from a Roth because the individual paid taxes on the money before investing it in the Roth plan. In certain situations, funds invested in Roth plans grow without taxes on gains or interest.

Lawmakers also endorsed SB 30, a proposed law that will give system administrators the authority to develop an alternative enhancement methodology to protect the long-term stability of the system. Retirement system officials will develop the plan, but it couldn’t be put into place without additional legislative approval.

The final bill, SB 31, makes several style and form changes to a host of retirement system statutes by cleaning up definitions, eliminating gender-specific terms and making other small amendments.

ASBSD continues to monitor the legislation.




Categories:2012 Legislative Session, SDRS,

Comments (0) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story



Senate moves to restrict retire-rehire
Posted Wednesday, January 27, 2010

The Senate endorsed changes Wednesday that will make is much more difficult for school districts to hire employees who have ever retired from a public employer.

The body approved the measure on a 24-10 vote, giving it the two-thirds majority required for passage.

The legislation, filed as SB 18, creates a mandatory three-month "clean break" between retirement and employment and levees financial penalties against individuals who retire and return to work in the public sector.

Sen. Tom Nelson, R-Lead, introduced the legislation, calling it "necessary legislation" to provide for the stability of the state retirement system. The practice costs the fund $5.2 million annually and, as currently permitted in state law, risks IRS intervention and sanction, he said.

Not all lawmakers were willing to accept the recommendations of the South Dakota retirement system.

Sen. Gene Abdullah, R-Brandon, challenged the IRS’s interest in sanctioning the system, and made repeated calls for documentation to support Sen. Nelson’s claim.

Other lawmakers, led by Sen. Julie Bartling, D-Burke, tried to remove the waiting period and individual penalties. She urged her lawmakers to keep return-to-work provisions in place, arguing that the restrictions would rob school districts and other local government entities of qualified employees. Her amendment failed, gaining support from just 11 lawmakers.

The legislation now moves onto the House.





Categories:2010 Legislative Session, SDRS,

Comments (0) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story



Committee moves to nix retire-rehire
Posted Thursday, January 21, 2010

Lawmakers have given initial approval to sweeping changes to South Dakota law that allows public employees to return to work after being retired.

Members of the Senate Retirement Laws Committee voted 3-2 Thursday evening to pass SB 18, legislation that will likely dramatically reduce a practice referred to “retire-rehire” by deterring public employers from hiring retirees and penalizing individuals who return to work following retirement.

Rob Wylie, executive director of the South Dakota Retirement System, asked lawmakers to adopt the changes. He told lawmakers that the proposal is designed to compensate for the costs associated with current return to work laws – a sum he estimated at $5 million annually. The changes are designed to prevent possible investigation by the IRS, Wylie said.

If the legislation passes, there would be a mandatory three-month waiting period before a retired employee can return to work. Individuals returning to work after three months would lose 15 percent of their anticipated benefit and future employer contributions – both would be paid to the South Dakota Retirement System.

ASBSD Chief Financial Officer Bill Lynch testified in opposition to the measure, arguing that the proposal infringes on a local school boards' ability to make hiring decisions. Lynch told lawmakers that current and future teacher shortages will challenge school districts, adding that school boards need all the tools available to keep qualified educators.

Joining in opposition were Jim Holbeck and Wayne Semmler, two superintendents who questioned the motives of the legislation. Both administrators argued that the changes were brought about under false pretenses and would drive educators out of state.

Two members of the committee – Gene Abdullah, R-Brandon, and Sandy Jerstad, D-Sioux Falls – were swayed by opponent testimony. But Tom Nelson, R-Spearfish Lead, Corey Brown, R-Gettysburg, and Kathy Miles, D-Sioux Falls, jointed to move the measure along. No legislators took time to explain their position on the vote.

The bill moves next to the Senate.
 
EDITORS NOTE: An observant reader corrected the citation on Sen. Tom Nelson. The Mayor of Lead likely doesn't live in Spearfish. Right. Thanks for reading, and for keeping us honest.


Categories:2010 Legislative Session, SDRS,

Comments (1) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story



Committee to consider retirement system changes next week
Posted Friday, January 15, 2010

The Senate Retirement Laws Committee has scheduled a hearing for Jan. 21 to consider a collection of legislative proposals that will reshape return-to-work rules, limit the cost-of-living adjustments for retirees and eliminate the optional spouse protection provision.

The package – found in SB 18, SB 19 and SB 20 – was endorsed last November by the South Dakota Retirement System (SDRS) Board of Directors. According to SDRS, the changes are necessary to improve the long-term stability of the system.

Changes to the return-to-work provisions, also known as retire-rehire, are certain to draw the most attention.

The return-to-work changes (SB 18), create a mandatory three-month break in service for anyone who retires and then is rehired into any employer that pays into SDRS. The bill also contains several punitive provisions related to retire-rehire, including an SDRS surcharge to employers for allowing a retire-rehire.

SDRS officials have said the limitations to retire-rehire will make the system IRS audit-proof and save money. ASBSD supports the employment decisions of local school boards and opposes the changes to retire-rehire policies.

The package (SB 20) also includes revisions to the cost-of-living adjustment for retirees. Currently, benefit payments increase at 3.1 percent annually due to the adjustment, also referred to as COLA. If the legislation passes, COLA increases will be 2.1 to 3.1 percent each year, depending on CPI-W.

The final piece (SB 19) prohibits new enrollments in a program that allows SDRS members to purchase an optional spouse protection plan. For individuals who currently buy into the program, the contribution will increase to 1.5 percent.



Categories:2010 Legislative Session, SDRS,

Comments (0) | Link to this story | Send to a friend | Print Story


Site by factor360 design + technology